Epidemiology
- Breast cancer affects 1:12 women
- In United Kingdom there are 24,000 new cases and 15,000 deaths
annually
- It is the commonest cause of cancer death in women
- It accounts for 6% of all female deaths
- Britain has highest breast cancer mortality in the world
WHO Classification
- Epithelial
- Non-invasive
- Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)
- Invasive
- Ductal (85%)
- Lobular (1%)
- Mucinous (5%)
- Papillary (<5%)
- Medullary (<5%)
- Mixed Connective tissue and Epithelial
- Miscellaneous
Diagnosis and assessment
- Most symptomatic cancers present as a painless lump
- Breast pain is an uncommon presentation of breast cancer
- Diagnosis is by Triple
Assessment
- Clinical Evaluation – Lump and regional nodes
- Imaging (ultrasound <35 years old or mammography >35 years old)
- Cytology or Histology
- Cytology is reported as:
- C1 = Inadequate sample
- C2 = Definitely benign
- C3 = Probably benign
- C4 = Suspicious of malignancy
- C5 = Definitely malignant
Aims of breast cancer surgery
- To achieve cure if excised before metastatic spread has occurred
- To prevent unpleasant sequelae of local recurrence
Surgical options for the breast
- Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) + radiotherapy
- BCS is regarded as either wide local excision, quadrantectomy or
segmentectomy
- Simple mastectomy
- Radical mastectomy - obsolete
- Mastectomy + reconstruction (immediate or delayed)
Tumours suitable for breast conservation
- Small single tumours in a large breast
- Peripheral location
- No local advancement or extensive nodal involvement
- For tumours that are suitable for breast conservation there is no
difference in local recurrence or overall survival when BCS +
radiotherapy is compared to mastectomy
Aims of axillary surgery
- 30-40% of patients with early breast cancer have nodal involvement
- The aims of axillary surgery is to:
- To eradicate local disease
- To determine prognosis to guide adjuvant therapy
- Clinical evaluation of the axilla is unreliable (30% false positive,
30% false negative)
- No reliable imaging techniques available
- Surgical evaluation important and should be considered for all
patients with invasive cancer
- Levels of axillary clearance are assessed relative to pectoralis
minor
- Level 1 - below pectoralis minor
- Level 2 - up to upper border of pectoralis minor
- Level 3 - to the outer border of the 1st rib
- Axillary samplings removes more than 4 nodes
- Pre-operative axillary ultrasound and biopsy may allow a tailored
approach to the axilla
Arguments for axillary clearance
- Axillary clearance both stages and treats the axilla
- Sampling potentially misses nodes and under stages the axilla
- Surgical clearance possibly gains better local control
- Avoids complications of axillary radiotherapy
- Avoids morbidity of axillary recurrence
Arguments for axillary sampling
- Only stages the axilla
- Must be followed by axillary radiotherapy
- The 60% of patients with node negative disease have unnecessary
surgery
- Radical lymphadenectomy in other cancers (e.g. melanoma) produces
disappointing results
- Avoids morbidity of axillary surgery
- The combination of axillary clearance and radiotherapy is to be
avoided
- Produces unacceptable rate of lymphoedema

Picture provided by Eldeeb Mabrouk, University
Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
Sentinel node biopsy
- Currently under investigation and should still be regarded as
experimental
- Aims to accurately stage the axilla without the morbidity of
axillary clearance
- Technique used to identify the first nodes that tumour drains to
- Can be located following the injection of either
- Radioisotope
- Blue dye
- Combination of isotope and blue dye
- Can be injected in peritumoural, subdermal or subareolar site
- Allows more detailed examination of nodes removed
- Significance of micrometastatic deposits identified in sentinel
nodes is unclear


Picture provided by O Olsha, Shaore Zedek Medical
Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
Prognostic factors
- 50% women with operable breast cancer who receive locoregional
treatment alone will die from metastatic disease.
- Prognostic factors have three main uses:
- To select appropriate adjuvant therapy according to prognosis
- To allow comparison of treatment between similar groups of patient
at risk of recurrence or death
- To improve the understanding of the disease
- Prognostic factors can be:
- Chronological
- Indication of how long disease has been present
- Relate to stage of the disease at presentation
- Biological
- Relate to intrinsic behaviour of tumour
Chronological prognostic factors
- Age
- Younger women have poorer prognosis of equivalent stage
- Tumour size
- Diameter of tumour correlates directly with survival
- Lymph node status
- Single best prognostic factor
- Direct correlation between number and level of nodes involved and
survival
- Metastases
- Distant metastases worsen survival
Biological prognostic factors
- Histological type
- Some histological types associated with improved prognosis:
- Tubular
- Cribriform
- Mucinous
- Papillary
- Micro-invasive
- Histological grade
- Three characteristics allow scoring of grade into grades one, two
or three depending on:
- Tubule formation
- Nuclear pleomorphism
- Mitotic frequency
- Lymphatic / vascular invasion
- 25% operable breast cancers have lympho-vascular invasion
- Double risk of local relapse
- Higher risk of short term systemic relapse
Biochemical measurements
- Hormone and growth factor receptors
- ER positivity predicts for response to endocrine manipulation
- EGF receptors are negatively correlated with ER and poorer
prognosis
- Oncogenes
- Tumours that express C-erb-B2 oncogene likely to be
- resistant to CMF chemotherapy
- resistant to hormonal therapy
- respond to anthracycline
- respond to taxols
- Proteases
- Urokinase and cathepsin D found in breast cancer
- Presence confers a poorer prognosis
Chemotherapy in breast cancer
- Can be given as:
- Primary systemic therapy prior to locoregional treatment
- Adjuvant therapy following locoregional treatment
- Post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy
- Depends primarily on:
- Age / menopausal status
- Nodal status
- Tumour grade
- Combination chemotherapy more effective than single drug
- Most commonly used regimen = CMF (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate,
5-Flurouracil)
- Given as six cycles at monthly intervals
- No evidence that more than 6 months treatment is of benefit
- Greatest benefit is seen in premenopausal women
- High -dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue produces no overall
survival benefit
Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy
- Chemotherapy prior to surgery for large or locally advanced tumours
- Shrinks tumour often allowing breast conserving surgery rather than
mastectomy
- 70% tumours show a clinical response
- In 20–30% this is response is complete
- Surgery required even in those with complete clinical response
- 80% of these patients still have histological evidence of tumour
- Primary systemic therapy has not to date been shown to improve
survival
Endocrine therapy in breast cancer
- It is just over 100 years since Beatson described response to
oophorectomy in women with advanced breast cancer
Tamoxifen
- Tamoxifen is an oral anti-oestrogen
- Effective in both the adjuvant setting and in advanced disease
- 20 mg per day is as effective as higher doses
- 5 years treatment is better than 2 years
- Value of treatment beyond 5 years is unknown
- Risk of contralateral breast cancer reduced by 40%
- Greater benefit seen in oestrogen receptor rich tumours
- Little benefit seen in oestrogen receptor negative tumours
- Benefit observed in both pre and post menopausal women
Aromatase inhibitors
- Several new endocrine therapies are available
- Reduced the peripheral conversion of androgens to oestrogens
- Only effective in post menopausal women
- May be superior to tamoxifen in high risk women
- To date have not been shown to have survival benefit compared with
tamoxifen
Biological therapy (Herceptin)
- HER receptors are proteins embedded in cell membrane
- Regulate cell growth, adhesion and migration
- The HER2 gene is over amplified in 20% of breast cancers
- HER2 positivity is an independent poor prognostic factor
- Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a monoclonal antibody that binds
selectively to the HER2 receptor
- Has been shown to improve survival in both the adjuvant and
metastatic setting
- Only works in HER2 positive cancers
- Response to therapy can be predicted by immunocytochemistry and
fluorescent in-situ hybridization
- Major side effects are cardiac
- Associated with cardiac dysfunction in 5% cases
Locally advanced breast cancer
- Regarded as a tumour that is not surgically resectable
- Clinical features include
- Skin ulceration
- Dermal infiltration
- Erythema over the tumour
- Satellite nodules
- Peau d'orange
- Fixation to chest wall, serratus anterior or intercostal muscles
- Fixed axillary nodes

- If oestrogen receptor-positive usually treated with primary
hormonal
- If oestrogen receptor-negative chemotherapy may be useful
- Radiotherapy may be useful in local control of disease
- If adequate response a salvage mastectomy can be consider
Recurrent breast cancer
- Most local recurrences are symptomatic

Male breast cancer
- 1% of all breast cancers occur in men
- Pathologically, the disease is similar to that which occurs in women
- The principles of treatment are the same
- The proportion of men undergoing mastectomy is higher
- Adjuvant therapy is the same as for women

Picture provided by Faisal Ashfaq, Civil Hospital,
Quetta, Pakistan

Picture provided by Namada Deivasigamani, Stanley
Hospital, Chennai, India
Bibliography
Benson J R, Jatoi I, Keisch et al. Early Breast Cancer.
Lancet 2009; 373: 1463-1479.
Fentiman I S, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi G N. Male breast
cancer. Lancet 2006; 365: 595-604
Johnston S R D. Systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Hosp Med 2001; 62: 289-295.
Nabholtz J M. Aromatase inhibitors in the management of early
breast cancer. EJSO 2008; 34: 1199-1207
Noguchi M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and breast cancer.
Br J Surg 2002; 89: 21-34.
Purushotham A D, MacMillan R D, Wishart G C. Advances
in axillary surgery for breast cancer - time for a tailored approach.
EJSO 2005; 31: 929-931
|