Gastrointestinal anastomoses
- Anastomoses can be fashioned in various ways
- End-to-end
- End-to-side
- Side-to-side
- Anastomoses heal in three phases
Lag phase (day 0-4)
- Acute inflammatory responses occurs
- Anastomosis has no intrinsic strength
Fibroplasia phase (day 3-14)
- Fibroblasts proliferate
- Immature collagen is laid down
Maturation phase (beyond 10 days)
- Collagen is remodelled
- Strength of anastomosis is increased
Factors influencing anastomotic healing
- Anastomotic technique is required to maintain apposition until collagen is laid down
- Anastomoses show serosal healing and require:
- Maintenance of apposition
- Good blood supply
- Tension free
- Anastomotic leak or failure my occur if:
- Distal obstruction
- Peri-anastomotic sepsis
- Per-anastomotic haematoma
- Hypotension
- Hypoxia
- Jaundice
- Corticosteroids
- Uraemia
- Any anastomotic technique should:
- Promote primary healing by accurate alignment of the divided bowel
- Cause minimal disruption of the local vasculature
- Incorporate minimum amount of foreign material
- Not implant malignant cells at the anastomosis
- Not enhance the risk of metachronous tumours
- No evidence to suggest that hand-sewn are superior to stapled anastomoses
Anastomotic techniques
- Conventional methods
- Novel techniques
- Compression rings
- Tissue glues
Two layered technique
- Classic teaching of GI anastomoses
- Inner continuous all layer catgut suture
- Outer seromuscular interrupted silk
- Produced serosal apposition and mucosal inversion
- Inner layer believed to be haemostatic but also strangulates mucosa
Single layered technique
- Modern teaching of GI anastomoses
- Interrupted seromuscular absorbable (e.g. 3/0 Vicryl on round bodied needle)
- Incorporates strong submucosal layer
- Minimal damage to submucosal vascular plexus
Stapled anastomoses
- Side to side anastomosis with linear staplers (e.g. GIA 60)
- End to end anastomosis with circular devices (e.g. CEEA)
- Stapled anastomoses reduced radiologically detected anastomotic leaks
- Associated with increased rate of anastomotic strictures
Drainage of anastomosis
- Drainage of anastomoses is controversial
- No evidence that the use of a drain reduced leak rate for anastomoses above pelvic brim
- Drain may increase risk of anastomotic leak
Biliary and urological anastomoses
Vascular anastomoses
- Always use nonabsorbable.
- Prolene most often used
- 2/0 on aorta
- 4/0 on femoral artery
Bibliography
Bruce J, Krukowski Z H, Al-Khairy G, Russell E M, Park K G. Systematic review
of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg
2001; 88: 1157-1168
Carty N J, Keating J, Campbell J,
Karanjia N, Heald R J. Prospective audit of an extramucosal
technique for intestinal anastomosis. Br
J Surg 1991; 78: 1439 - 1441.
Fraser I. Intestinal anastomosis with a skin stapler: a
safe and efficient method in humans. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 665 - 667.
Irwin S T, Krukowski Z H, Matheson
N A. Single-layer anastomosis in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Br J Surg 1990; 77:
643-644.
Lustosa S A, Matos D, Atallah A N, Castro A A. Stapled versus handsewn method for
colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; CD 001825.
Sarin S, Lightwood R G. Continuous
single-layer gastrointestinal anastomosis: a prospective audit.
Br J Surg 1988; 155:
611-614.
Steele R J C. Continuous single-layer serosubmucosal anastomosis
in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Br
J Surg 1993; 80: 1416-1417.
Thompson
W H F, Robinson M H E. One-layer
continuously sutured colonic anastomosis. Br J Surg 1993;
80: 1450-1451.
|