Assessment of abdominal trauma
- Assessment of patients with abdominal trauma can be difficult due to
- Altered sensorium (head injury, alcohol)
- Altered sensation (spinal cord injury)
- Injury to adjacent structures (pelvis, chest)
- Pattern of injury will be different between penetrating and blunt trauma
Indications for laparotomy
- Unexplained shock
- Rigid silent abdomen
- Evisceration
- Radiological evidence of intraperitoneal gas
- Radiological evidence of ruptured diaphragm
- Gunshot wounds
- Positive result on diagnostic peritoneal lavage
Imaging
- Either CT or ultrasound can be used for the assessment of abdominal trauma
- CT scanning is preferred method but requires patient to be cardiovascularly stable
- Ultrasound has high specificity but low sensitivity for the detection of:
- Free fluid
- Visceral damage
FAST
- Focused assessment for the sonographic assessment of trauma
- Is the use of ultrasound to rapidly assess for intraperitoneal fluid
- Probe is placed on the:
- Right upper quadrant
- Left upper quadrant
- Suprapubic region
- Fluid in subphrenic, subhepatic spaces or Pouch of Douglas in hypotensive patient
- Confirms likely need for emergency laparotomy
Peritoneal lavage
Indications
- Equivocal clinical examination
- Difficulty in assessing patient
- Persistent hypotension despite adequate resuscitation
- Multiple injuries
- Stab wounds where the peritoneum has been breached
Method
- Ensure that a catheter and nasogastric tube are in-situ
- Under LA make vertical sub-umbilical incision and divide linea alba
- Incise peritoneum and insert peritoneal dialysis catheter
- Aspirate any free blood or gastric content
- If no blood seen - infuse 1litre of normal saline an allow 3 min. to equilibrate
- Place drainage bag on floor and allow to drain
- Send 20 ml to laboratory for measurement of RBC, WCC and microbiological examination
Positive result
- Red cell count more than 100,000 / mm3
- White cell count more than 500 / mm3
- Presence of bile, bacteria or faecal material
Damage Control Surgery
- Following multiple trauma poor outcome is seen in those with
- Hypothermia
- Coagulopathy
- Severe acidosis
- Prolonged surgery can exacerbate these factors
- As a result the concept of 'damage control' surgery has been developed
- Damage control surgery should be considered if a patient with multiple trauma has
- Injury severity score greater than 25
- Core temperature less than 34 degree
- Arterial gas pH less than 7.1
Initial operation
- Early management of major abdominal trauma surgery should aim to:
- Control haemorrhage with ligation of vessels and packing
- Remove dead tissue
- Control contamination with clamps and stapling devices
- Lavage the abdominal cavity
- Close the abdomen without tension
- A plastic sheet or 'Bogata bag' may be useful

Picture provided by Mr. J C Campbell, Derriford Hospital Plymouth
Intensive care unit
- Early surgery should be followed by a period of stabilisation on the intensive care unit
- During this period the following should be addressed
- Rewarming
- Ventilation
- Restoration of perfusion
- Correction of deranged biochemistry
- Commence enteral or parenteral nutrition
'Second look laparotomy'
- Planned re-laparotomy at 24 - 48 hours allows:
- Removal of packs
- Removal of dead tissue
- Definitive treatment of injuries
- Restoration of intestinal continuity
- Closure of musculofacial layers of abdominal wall
- This approach has been shown to be associated with a reduced mortality
Gastrointestinal injury
- Small bowel perforations can invariably be primarily closed
- The management of colonic perforations is more controversial
- Used to common practice to excise damaged segment
- Proximal stoma was then fashioned
- Perforation could also be exteriorised as a stoma
- Increasingly recognised that primary repair of colonic injuries is safe
- Now recommended method, especially in the absence of significant contamination
Bibliography
Brookes
A J,
Rowlands B J.
Blunt abdominal injuries.
Brit Med Bull 1999;
55:
844-855.
Curran T J, Borzotta A P. Complications of primary repair of colon injuries: literature
review of 2,964 cases. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 42-47.
Hoey B A, Schwab C W. Damage control surgery. Scand J Surg 2002; 91:
92-103.
Loveland J A, Boffard K D. Damage control in the abdomen and beyond. Br J Surg
2004; 91: 1095-110.
Moore A F K, Hargest R, Martin M et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the
abdominal compartment syndrome. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1101-1110.
Nelson R, Singer M. Primary repair for penetrating colon injuries. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2002; CD002247.
Offner
P J, De Souza A L, Moore E E et al. Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in
damage control laparotomy after trauma. Arch Surg 2001; 136; 676-81.
Parks R W, Chrysos E, Diamond T. Management of liver trauma. Br J Surg
1999: 86: 1121-1135.
Stengel D, Bauwens J, Sehouli J et al. Systemic review and meta-analysis of
emergency ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 901-912.
|