Aetiology
- Principal causes vary between Western and developing countries
- Common causes are:
- Congenital valvular abnormalities (e.g. bicuspid aortic valve)
- Infective endocarditis
- Rheumatic fever
- Degenerative valve disease
- Ischaemic heart disease
Pathology
- Rheumatic fever results from immune-mediated inflammation of heart valve
- Results from cross reaction between Group A haemolytic strep and cardiac proteins
- Valve disease results in either stenosis or incompetence
- Stenosis causes pressure load on proximal chamber
- Incompetence causes volume load proximal chamber
- Thrombus may form in dilated left atrium resulting in peripheral embolisation
Clinical features
Aortic stenosis
- Angina pectoris
- Syncopal episodes
- Left ventricular failure
- Slow upstroke to arterial pulse
- Ejection systolic murmur in 2nd right intercostal space
Aortic regurgitation
- Congestive cardiac failure
- Increased pulse pressure
- Water-hammer pulse
- Early diastolic murmur at left sternal edge
Mitral stenosis
- Pulmonary hypertension
- Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea
- Atrial fibrillation
- Loud first heart sound
- Mid diastolic murmur at apex
Mitral regurgitation
- Pulmonary oedema
- Apex beat displace laterally
- Apical pansystolic murmur
Tricuspid stenosis
- Fatigue and peripheral oedema
- Hepatomegaly and ascites
- Increased JVP with prominent a waves
- Diastolic murmur at left sternal edge
Tricuspid regurgitation
- Pulsatile hepatomegaly and ascites
- Right ventricular heave
- Prominent JVP with large v waves
- Pansystolic murmur at left sternal edge
New York Heart Association classification
- Dyspnoea can be classified by severity of symptom
| Classification |
Symptoms |
| NYHA I |
Capable of ordinary physical activity |
| NYHA II |
Ordinary activity induces dyspnoea |
| NYHA III |
Limitation of physical activity |
| NYHA IV |
Symptoms at rest |
Investigation
- Investigation of valvular heart disease will require:
- Electrocardiogram
- Chest x-ray
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac catheterisation with measurement of transvalvular gradient
Medical Management
- Few patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis survive 5 years
- Approximately 20% of symptomatic patients will suffer sudden death
- Asymptomatic mitral stenosis is well tolerated with greater than 50% 10-year survival
- Medical management consists of:
- Treatment of cardiac failure
- Digitalisation if in atrial fibrillation
- Anticoagulation if evidence of peripheral embolisation
Surgical management
- Approximately 7,000 patients per year undergo valve replacement
- Aortic valve is commonest to be replaced (~75% of operations)
Indications for surgery
- Aortic valve replacement
- Symptomatic aortic stenosis
- Asymptomatic aortic stenosis with pressure gradient > 50 mmHg
- Symptomatic aortic regurgitation
- Mitral valve replacement
- Symptomatic mitral stenosis especially if peripheral emboli
- Mitral valve area less than 1 cm2
- Surgery usually performed through a median sternotomy
- On cardiopulmonary bypass with systemic hypothermia
- Heart is arrested and protected with cardioplegic solution
- Valve can be either repaired or replaced
- Valve repair results in better haemodynamics
- Does not require long-term anticoagulation
Prosthetic heart valves
- Principal types are:
- Heterografts (e.g. pig) – stented or unstented
- Homografts
- Ball and cage (e.g. Starr-Edwards)
- Tilting disc (e.g. Bjork-Shiley)
Mechanical valves
- Readily available
- Good durability
- Require life-long anticoagulation
- Risk of endocarditis

Heterografts
- Readily available
- Limited lifespan (aortic valves ~ 15 years, mitral valve ~8 years)
- Limited duration of anticoagulation
Homografts
- Not readily available
- Do not require anticoagulation
- Long-term outcome uncertain
Bibliography
Goldsmith I, Turpie A G, Lip G Y. Valvular heart disease and prosthetic heart valves. Br
Med J 2002; 325: 1228-1331.
Rahimtoola S H. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;
41: 893-904.
Thamilarasan M, Griffin B. Choosing the most appropriate valve operation and prosthesis. Cleve
Clin J Med 2002; 69: 693-698. |